Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-13-Speech-1-119"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Relocation in the context of regional development (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060313.18.1-119"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-13-Speech-1-1202
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Olbrycht2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; REGI (2004-07-23--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2006-02-06--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (2005-03-29--2006-12-31)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the text of the resolution we are to vote on has been the subject of difficult concessions and compromises. Nonetheless, I would like to draw the attention of the House to a couple of important issues in the course of this debate. Firstly, the text rightly points out the danger of inappropriate use of European funds if they are used in order to transfer production, when the funds are linked to structural intervention areas in a specific region. In a sense, therefore, the funds are linked to that region. Secondly, the text is interventionist in nature and amounts to a set of preventive or repressive proposals. Thirdly, in this text relocation is perceived as a real threat, even though the references are only to potentially negative consequences. Only at the start of the resolution is it stated that there can be many reasons for relocation, and that these might be linked to efficiency and profitability. Thereafter, the focus is exclusively on negative mechanisms. The text makes only a brief mention of the difference between internal and external relocation, and does not pay sufficient attention to the promotion of positive mechanisms that would encourage investors to remain in the EU. The text also fails to distinguish between smaller and larger enterprises in the various categories, which is the case for public aid. In future, texts of this nature should be accompanied by detailed economic analyses highlighting economic conditions and the duration of the production cycle."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph