Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-16-Speech-4-056"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060216.10.4-056"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, further to Mr Mauro’s suggestion and Mr Cohn-Bendit’s amendment, I propose that we should indeed opt for the word ‘condemns’ at that point and use the second part, as proposed by the Verts/ALE Group, as a paragraph 13a. I, too, would support it were it to be that. The consequence of that would be that we would have a two-part vote, which might well be a compromise solution to which the House could agree."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples