Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-15-Speech-3-252"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU forestry strategy (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060215.16.3-252"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-15-Speech-3-2532
lpv:speaker	lp:Janusz Wojciechowski2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; CONT (2006-01-05--2007-01-14)3,3 vice-chair; AGRI (2004-07-23--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; BUDG (2006-01-05--2007-01-14)3,3 member; UEN (2005-12-13--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, what I have to say also concerns the problem facing Polish forests mentioned by the previous speaker. Poland’s forests are a significant resource, but unlike in most EU countries, the majority – more than 80% of the total area – are state-owned. This is the result of a long historical process and at present there are no reasons for a radical change in the structure of forest ownership in Poland. Public opinion in Poland is largely in favour of forests continuing to be state-owned. The problem is that the EU has thus far discriminated against state-owned forests, denying them support. I am pleased that Mr Kindermann’s report contains one amendment that holds out the hope that the situation will change and that EU support will be given to forests irrespective of how they are owned. This is something we very much need in Poland and we trust that the Commission will demonstrate understanding of the situation."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph