Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-330"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060214.28.2-330"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, first of all, I should like to say that this is not about the East against the West, because I come from the West and I am all in favour of the Services Directive. We should not lose sight of the directive’s objective, which is to break down unnecessary barriers for small and medium-sized companies, enabling them to offer their services in other countries. With a watered-down directive as proposed by the Socialists and some members of the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats, we are at risk of battening up the markets even more. Whilst we should protect valuable social achievements, we should not indulge in protectionism, nationalism and certainly not xenophobia.
In the global economy, it is important to strengthen the European market, rather than fragment and weaken it. The services market offers marvellous opportunities to many, and innovative and quality jobs can be created in the services sector.
The debate reeks of hypocrisy, for, while the old Member States in the West fear competition from the East, they forget that Western undertakings have been doing business in Eastern Europe for the past 15 years, and have been doing very well out of it.
The directive must be adopted with the widest possible scope, which means that services of general interest or services of general economic interest – and it is perhaps time we defined those terms – that are currently on offer should fall within its scope without further ado, just like health care, temporary employment agencies and gambling. The country-of-origin principle, even if we change its name, should simply be left alone.
I will vote for this directive only if it results in more free movement of services. A compromise that intends to batten up the markets even more will not receive my vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples