Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-158"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060214.22.2-158"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-14-Speech-2-1592
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I said this morning how shocking it was that we were trying to give the world lessons on human rights when the European Union cheerfully violates them, particularly when it comes to freedom of expression, on its own territory. However, there are other reasons to oppose Mr Agnoletto's report. It makes reference to Article 60 of the Vienna Convention, in particular the non-execution clause that allows us to ignore the requirements of a treaty on the basis that the other party has not fulfilled its obligations. The only problem with that is that the European Union is the sole arbiter of this circumstance, which seems to me to be a totally abusive interpretation. We should at least have an arbitration system, otherwise this condition is, in reality, a potestative clause that enables us to escape from our obligations as we please or, conversely, to stick to them when it comes to powerful states from which there may be reprisals. That is not acceptable."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph