Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-131"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060214.22.2-131"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-14-Speech-2-1322
lpv:speaker	lp:Albert Jan Maat2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PECH (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2007-04-09)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2007-04-09)3 substitute; BUDG (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; DROI (2004-09-28--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Christen Democratisch Appèl (2004-07-20--2007-04-09)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-20--2007-03-14)3 member; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to give an explanation of vote to clarify why we in the CDA Party have voted against the report. We have done so because, whilst we are in favour of animal welfare, certainly in the poultry sector, it is unacceptable that we should not prescribe the same requirements for imports. A second reason is that this report leads to more bureaucracy, while we in Europe need less of it. We want less red tape, also because the impact of the introduction of this directive is only assessed after the event and not before. That strikes us as cheap politics on the back of European poultry farmers, which is not what we want. What we do want is improved welfare, provided this is established on the basis of a fair distribution of the burden between consumers and producers. I would like Mrs McGuinness to be given another opportunity to speak on this subject."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph