Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-14-Speech-2-127"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060214.22.2-127"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-14-Speech-2-1282
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Schlyter2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Miljöpartiet (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; PECH (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted against this proposal at first reading, but the governments of the Member States have now improved it. This directive does not involve extensive new legislation but merely applies already current laws to areas in which the EU has already assumed competence. The bizarre proposal to include solar radiation has been removed. Moreover, the rules are based on international conventions and, where there are no such conventions, national legislation is accepted. Health surveillance and subsequent checks are to be carried out in accordance with national practices. This is, therefore, a decently balanced and acceptable proposal. The advantages in terms of protecting workers outweigh the problem of having further legislation, because this directive does not in practice lead to any new EU powers."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph