Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-13-Speech-1-030"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Order of business2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060213.9.1-030"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-13-Speech-1-0312
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Cohn-bendit2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Germany) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 co-chair; G/EFA (2005-05-24--2007-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2006-12-12)3
lpv:translated text	"I can tell Mr Poettering that I am opposed, and I also want to explain why. This week, this whole House is going to have its hands full of this Services Directive, and I see no chance of a proper resolution and compromise in these three days. That, after all, is why we proposed it last week! That is why I think Mr Swoboda’s suggestion is a sensible one. This House does indeed need a resolution on this issue, but it also needs to be given the chance to put a proper resolution together, and that is why we should start the debate now and then follow it up by voting on this resolution at the next part-session. That would be the sensible thing to do. All you will be able to adopt in these three days is banalities, and I believe that this issue deserves better than that."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph