Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-01-18-Speech-3-277"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-01-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:The period of reflection: structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the EU2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060118.20.3-277"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-01-18-Speech-3-2782
lpv:speaker	lp:Stavros Lambrinidis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-chair; LIBE (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Panellinio Socialistiko Kinima (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, eight months after the rejection of the text of the Constitutional Treaty in the referenda held in France and the Netherlands, we are still in an interminable period of reflection on how to word it. It is time we got to work. What is this work? In my opinion, it is not analysing ourselves in interminable discussions about the precise definition of the new social state, EU financing and so on. If we believe that we shall find common ground between us on all these questions as a precondition to trying the Constitution again, I believe that we shall never have a European constitution. On the contrary, in my opinion there should only be one final objective to this period of reflection. Irrespective of each person's political convictions, we need to persuade ourselves that, for all these major European wagers, we can, as Europeans, address them better jointly than separately. This is perhaps also the most important context which is missing for any text if it is to be acceptable to everyone."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph