Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-01-17-Speech-2-256"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060117.21.2-256"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Question No 27 by Katerina Batzeli ()
The Commission's efforts gradually to create a more transparent and open European defence procurement market are moving in the right direction despite the particular features of this sector.
The procedure followed so far is based partly on Directive 2004/18/ECand partly on Article 296 of the Treaty, which provides for derogations. To what extent does the Commission intend, provisionally, to define more clearly the criteria for implementing Article 296 concerning derogations, together with the criteria for the scrutiny and monitoring of the related national procedures?
To what extent can it be considered that derogations whereby government authorities negotiate with suppliers of their choice in respect of the manufacture of goods for the purposes of research, study and experiment and the supply of defence material by legal persons, in which the government holds more than 50% of the capital, are consistent with the conditions governing the application of Article 296?"@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: Public defence procurement contracts"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples