Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-01-17-Speech-2-203"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-01-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Common organisation of the market in sugar – Support schemes for farmers (sugar) – Restructuring the sugar industry2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060117.20.2-203"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-01-17-Speech-2-2042
lpv:speaker	lp:Kartika Tamara Liotard2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Socialistische Partij (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Commissioner, the sugar reform, as it is currently before us, will be pernicious to poor developing countries and ACP countries that are now losing their access to the market or are given lower prices for their products. As far as I am concerned, every agricultural reform that harms developing countries is a bad one. This reform also deals a lethal blow to the incomes of thousands of farmers and workers in the sugar industry, and the absence of a proper social plan to mitigate it turns this into a worthless exercise. Finally, this reform does not benefit the European taxpayer in any way because it is budget-neutral. Given these three considerations, we can sum this reform up as a disaster. There is no question that the European sugar policy should be reformed, but not in a way from which only major food producers benefit."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph