Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-01-17-Speech-2-040"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-01-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Market access to port services2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060117.5.2-040"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-01-17-Speech-2-0412
lpv:speaker	lp:Hélène Goudin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IND/DEM (2004-07-20--2007-06-12)3 substitute; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, there are several good reasons for rejecting the ports directive. Firstly, this is an issue on which each Member State should decide in accordance with the EU’s principle of subsidiarity. It is for the Member States to adopt positions on this type of issue. Our basic view is that Swedish rules should apply on Swedish territory. Secondly, the process whereby the ports directive has again appeared on the agenda is undemocratic. The European Parliament rejected an identical proposal by the Commission barely a year ago. Thirdly, the players who would be affected by this directive do not think very much of it. There is currently efficient competition between European ports. The ports directive would lead to a distortion of competition because the ship owners’ own staff would take over the job of loading and unloading. Who really wants this directive? Its main advocate is the Commission, which wants to drive through this legislation at any price. The Swedish June List will reject this legislative proposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph