Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-12-15-Speech-4-129"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20051215.29.4-129"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
We regret the fact that our proposal in support of increasing the global financial envelope for fisheries was rejected. This rejection is typical of the inconsistency of both Parliament and the rapporteur; both acknowledge that the budget falls short of what is required if we are to address the economic and social crisis facing the sector, and yet despite the fact that it is one of the key issues in the report before us, it is not being increased.
We are very pleased, on the other hand, that our proposal aimed at funding measures to promote or set up small-scale coastal fishing representative associations, and to ensure their involvement in the decision-making process of the common fisheries policy was adopted. This proposal was in line with the outcome of the public hearing on this section of the fleet held by Parliament’s Committee on Fisheries.
I should like to point out that there are aspects of the current regulation on which we have reservations, due to their ramifications for the sovereignty of Member States. Examples of this include the role of the Community Fisheries Control Agency, and the rapporteur’s proposal to set up a framework agreement as regards the fisheries agreements with third countries.
We therefore opted to abstain."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples