Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-12-14-Speech-3-100"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051214.11.3-100"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-12-14-Speech-3-1012
lpv:speaker	lp:Gay Mitchell2
lpv:spoken text	". I do not know why this proposal was rushed, the 'extremely accelerated legislation procedure has meant that there was little time for discussion and translations were sometimes unavailable. There was also no time for a technology assessment or for a study on the impact on the internal market. Bearing in mind the measures and plans aimed at better regulation at European level, it is to be hoped that the procedure used for debating data retention will not become the rule', to quote directly from the report to Parliament. There is a framework decision on this issue still with the Council of Ministers. There is doubt that the correct legal basis was used for this proposal."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; DEVE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-16--2007-03-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Fine Gael Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Gay Mitchell (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph