Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-12-13-Speech-2-152"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051213.52.2-152"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-12-13-Speech-2-1532
lpv:speaker	lp:Avril Doyle2
lpv:spoken text	". On Amendments 1 and 2 to the Blokland report on batteries and accumulators, I have decided to vote in favour of a single environmental legal base of Article 175 EC. As with the debate on the fluorinated gases regulation, although this is a less clear cut example, I have concerns about the lack of certainty we are introducing into our legislation through dual legal bases following ECJ judgments in this area. What industry needs more than anything is legal certainty and, given the precedent case law, this is not the direction in which we are going. Article 175 has inbuilt safeguards (in Article 176 EC) against unilateral trade distorting decisions that may be protectionist in nature rather than environmentally justifiable. It is not necessary to complicate EC legislation further by founding it on multiple legal bases."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Fine Gael Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; ITRE (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Gulf States, including Yemen (2004-09-20--2007-03-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Avril Doyle (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph