Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-11-15-Speech-2-119"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-11-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051115.21.2-119"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-11-15-Speech-2-1202
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3,3 member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 unknown; Coligaçao Força Portugal (PPD/PSD.CDS-PP) (2004-07-20--2007-11-22)3,3 vice-chair; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". As the explanatory statement to this report rightly points out, ‘the regulation plays the important role of establishing one of the four fundamental freedoms of the EU, namely the free movement of European citizens. The possibility of living, working and moving freely within the EU, and the removal of as many financial and administrative obstacles to doing so as possible, is indeed a tangible benefit conferred on the citizens of Europe by EU membership’. This is indeed the case. The inherent possibilities in the social protection afforded to citizens of EU Member States has been a key factor in the promotion of genuine freedom of movement. The issue here is not one of social security models or the rules governing different systems, but is, rather, one of adapting and updating what needs to be adapted and updated in the current regulation. I voted in favour, given that this adaptation is consistent with the objectives and principles of the regulation in question."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph