Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-10-25-Speech-2-242"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20051025.21.2-242"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Question No 60 by Sajjad Karim ()
In a question submitted in August, P-3040/05 , regarding the ICJ ruling on the Separation Wall in Eastern Jerusalem, I asked the Commission to outline a 'concrete plan to fulfil its own obligations...under the ruling of 9 July 2004'. The Commission re-stated the EU position on this issue and claimed that 'dialogue is seen as the most effective way to make known one's views'. The ruling articulates erga omnes obligations 'to see to it that any impediment, resulting from the construction of the Wall, to the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self-determination is brought to an end,' which clearly require more than a mere expression of views. Moreover, the fact that the Wall is still under construction today indicates that political dialogue has proved wholly inadequate in ensuring Israeli compliance with international law.
Can the Commission explain what other tools are at its disposal to ensure compliance and, objectively and transparently, indicate under what circumstances it would use them in the fulfilment of its own obligations?"@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples