Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-10-12-Speech-3-087"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-10-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Iran2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051012.13.3-087"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-10-12-Speech-3-0882
lpv:speaker	lp:Hans-Peter Martin2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Liste Dr. Hans-Peter Martin - Für echte Kontrolle in Brüssel (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2005-09-08--2007-01-14)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-22--2007-03-13)3 member; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2004-10-13--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, de-escalation, the need to favour a political solution over recourse to the Security Council and, most of all, credibility – these topics are on everyone’s lips. Of course they are! If, though, we put ourselves into the other side’s shoes, we cannot fail to regard the International Atomic Energy Agency, as being, by reason of the way it is constituted, of course, biased in favour of the established nuclear powers. The snag is that it is simply not possible to separate peaceful from military use of atomic material with any certainty. As I see it, the right approach for the European Union to take ought to be far more radical, which would involve putting a question mark against our own and working to de-escalate to the point where there would be ‘no nukes’."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"force de frappe"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph