Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-29-Speech-4-109"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050929.14.4-109"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-29-Speech-4-1102
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". The World Summit 2005, which has just ended, has been a failure, despite many of us preferring to concentrate on the minimal progress made, even if it means exaggerating the scope and importance of that progress. The final text adopted, which was the outcome of a laborious compromise, resembles more a catalogue of good intentions and pious hopes than an action programme. It must be said, however, that the UN is an old lady of 60 years of age, whose organisation and way of working seem to have been set in stone from birth. It is high time, in fact, that the developments brought about in the world since the end of the Second World War were taken into account. This would include, for example, agreeing to an increase in the number of permanent members of the Security Council to incorporate Germany, Japan, India and Brazil, but without the right of veto so as not to paralyse the institution. Finally, I would like to reaffirm the fact that the UN is an organisation of independent countries and that it is entirely unacceptable that the Commission should claim to represent the Member States of the European Union there on its own. Moreover, that is the case whether it is representing Member States at the General Assembly or on the Security Council."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph