Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-28-Speech-3-165"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050928.19.3-165"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
This compromise resolution deals with the Turkey–Cyprus issue satisfactorily and reasonably clearly. I should have liked to see clearer statements regarding democracy und human rights in Turkey.
According to Amnesty International, torture in Turkey continues to assume proportions similarly serious to before; it just takes a different form. The case of Mehmet Tarhan was a recent example of how conscientious objectors are punished with years of imprisonment. There are renewed conflicts in the Kurdish regions, police and military forces are omnipresent, and state and non-state actors commit human-rights violations. Freedom of the press is continually violated: for example, anyone publishing material that takes a critical line on the genocide of Armenians or the continuing Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus still faces imprisonment.
As far as the EU Heads of State or Government are concerned, a key motivation for this accession is geopolitics. A Commission working document drawn up to render Turkey’s accession to the EU plausible states: ‘Turkey is a strategically important country (...) Turkey’s accession would help to secure better energy supply routes for the EU.’ It continues: ‘With its large military expenditure and manpower, Turkey has the capacity to contribute significantly to EU security and defence’.
I, too, wish to see Turkey’s accession to the EU; just not like this. The EU Heads of State or Government and the European Commission evidently care little about the real-life situation of the people."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples