Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-27-Speech-2-305"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Community railways2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050927.22.2-305"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-27-Speech-2-3062
lpv:speaker	lp:Armando Dionisi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2004-09-15--2006-04-27)3 unknown; Unione dei Democratici cristiani e dei Democratici di Centro (2004-07-20--2006-04-27)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2004-09-16--2006-04-27)3 member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2006-04-27)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2006-04-27)3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-22--2006-04-27)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the train is the only mode of transport in Europe to be experiencing a worrying period of stagnation, despite the increase in trade. The environmental emergency, the high cost of oil and congestion on the roads require a firm decision on rail transport, which is cleaner and safer and has good domestic infrastructures which can be integrated at European level. To revitalise and modernise rail transport is a matter of priority for the future of the Union. The Commission has made considerable efforts towards increased harmonisation and liberalisation of the markets, but it is the European Parliament which has had – and still has – a central role to play in this area by overcoming national self-interest. The courageous proposal to open up even domestic passenger transport to full liberalisation is vital to complete the single market, relaunch community rail services and provide a better service to the population. In this context, the amendment on reciprocity, which I proposed and with which the Commission concurred, ensures that countries which opt to open up their markets prior to the set deadlines should be protected against unfair competition from rail companies operating in protected domestic markets. I also believe that the regulations on passengers’ rights and their extension to domestic traffic are particularly important. Payment of compensation for delays, damage and accidents, and the rights of disabled passengers provide an excellent basis to encourage our companies to adopt high quality standards and to be competitive with other modes of transport. A shift to rail transport, ladies and gentlemen, is one of those challenges where the credibility and future of Europe are at stake. For this reason, it is vital that Parliament takes a strong and clear stance on this package and does not hesitate to opt for a strategy of innovation."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph