Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-27-Speech-2-116"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050927.15.2-116"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The delusion that legislating on this issue is a simple process takes no account of the evidence that different legal systems produce different results, which may prove unpredictable or unwanted. Take, for example, the issue of the suspensive effect of appealing against a decision not to grant refugee status.
This delusion also overlooks the fact that there are different traditions as regards the actual definition of refugee. Take the difference between Portugal and the United Kingdom, for example.
These two aspects were the reason why I voted as I did on the report before us. Given that all of the points I felt were key were rejected by the Left in Parliament, I was unable to vote for this report. All that remains is for me to express my disappointment that the Left’s obviously good intentions will, as often happens, produce an unwanted outcome. A series of moderately flexible rules aimed at making the necessary adaptations to the various national legislations in no way undermines the need to ensure decent, humane hosting of refugees. In fact, this is the right way of addressing justified concern over the refugee issue, and demonstrates a desire to find workable solutions."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples