Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-27-Speech-2-106"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050927.15.2-106"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
I am broadly in favour of the thrust of the proposal tabled by the four Member States, and share the concerns expressed therein. I also feel that, overall, it does not contain anything excessive or disproportionate. Nevertheless, I voted in favour of the report proposing the rejection of the proposal by the four Member States, because while I welcomed the thrust of the proposal, the Commission is soon to present a thorough, comprehensive proposal on this issue, and I believe that this is the right way to make law on this issue.
At the present time, security must not be confused with securitarianism. The retention of communications traffic data is not at all the same as bugging telephone calls; it is simply a matter of retaining the minimum amount needed for effective criminal investigation. Although the strength of this measure does not specifically lie in prevention – although this element is a part of it – its usefulness in terms of criminal investigation is clear for all to see.
Accordingly, let us now hope that the Commission justifies the trust placed in it and, at the earliest opportunity, presents the proposal required to regulate this important area."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples