Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-08-Speech-4-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050908.13.4-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-08-Speech-4-1072
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Coligaçao Força Portugal (PPD/PSD.CDS-PP) (2004-07-20--2007-11-22)3 vice-chair; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". As author of the report on tourism in Europe, I have followed Mr Cornillet’s work with interest. I feel that we both work on the basis of the same opinion that tourism is an industry with the potential to revitalise societies, and that this should not be neglected. Nevertheless, I believe that this report proposes measures that go beyond the Union’s remit and harm private initiative, which lies at the heart of this industry. The scope of the Cornillet report stretches even further – it cuts across our policies on development aid. In this respect, tourism can make a significant contribution towards democratisation and political balance in these societies, as it promotes job creation, helps to develop new technology and contributes towards vocational training. Yet it is through private initiatives that this process will develop and there is no doubt in my mind that we do not need regulatory or interventionist measures, which could prove counterproductive. I therefore abstained in the vote on the Cornillet report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph