Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-06-Speech-2-244"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050906.33.2-244"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-06-Speech-2-2452
lpv:speaker	lp:Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (2004-07-20--2006-10-04)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-05-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No. 41 by Nikolaos Vakalis () First inconsistency in the White Paper entitled 'Prospects for the EU in 2005', the UK states that the financial perspective must cover the needs of the new Member States. In its document entitled 'Financial Perspective - Why 1% is not realistic', the Commission explains that 1% of GDP entails a huge cutback in funding for Bulgaria and Romania as well as for the full integration of the 10 new Member States. Nor will the 1% enable an agreement to be reached to ensure financial balance between the 25. Second inconsistency the strengthening of competitiveness urged by the UK Presidency is incompatible with its 1% proposal. How does the Commission intend to cooperate with the UK Presidency to break the current deadlock over the financial perspective without loss to the new and old Member States and without losing competitiveness?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Financial Perspective for 2007-2013"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph