Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-06-Speech-3-217"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050706.23.3-217"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Whilst it contained some points that we welcome, two points led us to vote against this resolution:
the Commission’s proposal for the European Fisheries Fund is consistent with the financial guidelines of the latest review of the common fisheries policy, in 2002, to which we were opposed.
the financial envelope proposed for 2007-2013 is EUR 4.9 billion, virtually unchanged from the amount set aside in Agenda 2000 for the EU of 15. This clearly falls a long way short of addressing the challenges facing the fisheries sector and the regions that depend on that sector.
Increasing the budget earmarked for this Fund will play a key role in ensuring support for small-scale, traditional coastal fishing, securing investment in renewing and modernising the fleet, taking socio-economic measures to compensate for the reduced fishing effort, financing recovery plans, and providing support for aquaculture-related industrial and commercial activities, with the involvement of fishermen and their associations, in line with the co-management principle.
Lastly, we regret the rejection of our proposals to fund compensation for fishermen’s loss of earnings due to a recovery plan and to place owners and workers on an equal footing when it comes to public aid for permanent cessation."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples