Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-06-Speech-3-177"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050706.23.3-177"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
As the spokesperson for this issue in the Parliament's largest group and head of the Finnish EPP-ED delegation, I think that the decision to reject the common position was the right one. According to my estimation, the resulting directive would not have been good enough. Rejecting the whole proposal was a smaller setback than it would have been to adopt bad legislation.
However, I regret that the attempt to harmonise varying patent practises in different Member States was rejected. Therefore I'll urge Commission to rapidly reintroduce the Community Patent proposal that was not adopted by the past legislature. Commission should also take the initiative to renovate the European patent system.
I also consider that today's decision is a major victory for the Parliament as an institution. The Council Common Position did not take into account at all the view of the majority of the Parliament. The Parliament showed that the Member States in the Council cannot walk all over the Parliament's view - whatever the matter in question."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples