Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-06-Speech-3-170"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050706.23.3-170"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-07-06-Speech-3-1712
lpv:speaker	lp:Gilles Savary2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I should like to express my satisfaction at the rejection of this common position, having failed to achieve anything better – in other words, having failed to be able to approve Mr Rocard's amendments one by one, which were intended to bring us back to the first reading by the European Parliament. Like my fellow Members, I do not believe it perpetuates legal uncertainty, because a lot has happened in the last three years. At first reading, the European Parliament adopted an unambiguous wording. Today it has just rejected the patentability of software programs. I believe we should stick to that and revert to the wording of Article 52 of the Munich European Convention because, in reality, it was not so much a question of confirming the patentability of software programs but rather of an offensive aimed at making them patentable. This offensive has been halted today in a major victory for European parliamentary democracy over the lobbies and over the Commission’s manoeuvring."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph