Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-05-Speech-2-246"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050705.26.2-246"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The debate is closed.
Concerning the Commission’s proposal to establish a European Grouping for Territorial Co-operation I am glad to tell you that the Commission is in a position to accept most of the Parliament’s Amendments.
The Commission can fully accept the following 17 Amendments : 1 - 7, 12, 14 - 16, 23, 25 - 27, 32 and 35.
Another 17 Amendments are acceptable in principle/substance, but subject to rewording (Amendments no 8, 9, 13, 17, 20 - 22, 24, 28 - 31, 33, 34, 38, 39 and 41).
A group of 2 Amendments is only partially acceptable (Amendments no 36 and 37).
Finally there is a small group of 6 Amendments not acceptable to the Commission (Amendments no 10, 18, 40 and 42 - 44). The last three amendments were tabled for the plenary session. However, their content was already covered by amendments accepted before.
Two Amendments (11 and 19) only concern an error in one linguistic version.
The vote will take place tomorrow at 12 noon.
The Commission is in a position to accept the following Amendments: 4, 8 (2nd part, as from ‘and the creation of…’), 10, 12, 13, 27 (1st part, up to ‘gap between regions’), 60, 65, 73, 74, 80 (1st part: ‘the development of…project development’), 102 (Article 14.1.2 ‘functionally’) and 108.
The Commission cannot accept Amendments 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (1st part: ‘the cultural …diversification of’), 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 (2nd part, after ‘gap between regions’), 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 (2nd part: ‘Articles 8…11’), 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117 (2nd part: ‘implementing …water policy’) 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125 and 126.
The Commission is able to accept the following amendments on condition that they are reworded:
The Commission is able to accept Amendments 32 and 117 on condition that they are reworded. In the case of the first part, ‘management …water supplies’
the Commission is open to accepting investments linked to the supply of water, as well as those related to its management and quality, without for all that funding the operating expenses and salaries in respect of water management. In the case of the last part, ‘promotion …NATURA 2000’, the Commission is able to accept the funding of investments related to Natura 2000, but not that of operating and operational expenses.
The Commission is able to accept Amendment 68 on condition that it is reworded: ‘by supporting urban and rural development and relationships’."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"(The sitting was suspended at 7.15 p.m. and resumed at 9 p.m.)"1
"FAVA report (A6-0184/2005 ) A6-0184/2005"1
"Olbrycht report (A6-0206/2005 ) A6-0206/2005"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples