Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-05-Speech-2-116"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050705.23.2-116"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The following are three key aspects of energy security that were not duly taken into account in the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. Firstly, greater use must be made of renewable energy sources. Secondly, balanced use must be made of different kinds of primary fuel. Thirdly, supplies from different production centres, such as oil and gas fields, must be diversified for each kind of primary fuel.
I believe that it would have a very detrimental impact if EU policy in this area were to be continued, as this policy results in the complete dependence of Poland on one supply source, namely Russian oil and gas, in the name of security. The second leg of the Yamal pipeline, which is currently at an advanced stage of planning, must definitely be continued. All other projects, however, such as the pipeline under the Baltic or the ‘Amber Pipeline’, must immediately be suspended, as they represent a direct threat to the newly revived Ukrainian democracy. Energy security for the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy must not be achieved at the cost of Polish dependency on Russian oil and gas, and it must not pose a threat to the economic stability of Ukraine."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples