Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-23-Speech-4-139"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-06-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050623.30.4-139"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-06-23-Speech-4-1402
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Coligaçao Força Portugal (PPD/PSD.CDS-PP) (2004-07-20--2007-11-22)3 vice-chair; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Freedom of movement is one of the freedoms that the citizens of the EU hold most dear. At the same time, immigration is one of the political questions that we must address seriously and with cool heads. That being said, I feel that the crux of the question addressed in the report, which in part verges on the technical, is, nonetheless, equally important. The practical rules governing both ‘internal border controls’ and ‘external border controls’ are of considerable significance. First and foremost, along with security and the exercise of authority comes respect for the citizens, be they nationals of EU Member States or otherwise. Nonetheless, I agree that there are exceptions, whereby a Member State may waive the rules, for perfectly valid reasons. I also back both the report’s support for the right of appeal against a decision to refuse entry, without prejudice to the immediate effectiveness of such a decision, and a set of rules on the procedures mentioned here."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph