Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-09-Speech-4-115"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-06-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050609.22.4-115"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-06-09-Speech-4-1162
lpv:speaker	lp:Tobias Pflüger2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (2004-07-20--2006-10-04)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Gulf States, including Yemen (2004-09-20--2007-03-13)3 member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Today’s resolution of this House on reform of the UN (B6 0328/2005, moved by Mr Laschet) advocates disturbing and aberrant developments within the United Nations by calling for the introduction into international law of what are termed military ‘humanitarian interventions’. Most seriously, though, the resolution opens the door to the possibility of pre-emptive warfare being mandated by the UN Security Council. Those who would like to see the UN mandating pre-emptive warfare tread international law underfoot. Reforming the UN in such a way would amount to the UN hallowing the principle of ‘might is right’. Such a ‘reform’ of the UN would endorse the dangerous concept of pre-emptive warfare; it would be no more and no less than a programme in support of war. This is one reason why I am very glad that the Confederal Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left has repudiated this resolution."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph