Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-09-Speech-4-090"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-06-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050609.22.4-090"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-06-09-Speech-4-0912
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Coligação Democrática Unitária (PCP-PEV) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; EMPL (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". As I said in my speech in plenary, this reform of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) is woefully inadequate. What we really need is to suspend the SGP and to make a complete break from the economic guidelines in place in order to create the macro-conditions to revitalise the economy and to create more jobs. That is why we advocate a genuine Growth, Employment and Social Progress Pact. A further reason why we voted against was that the rapporteur seeks to involve the European Central Bank and proposes that the Commission should carry out financial auditing on the Member States. This is a perfect example of a report that loses sight of the underlying reasons behind the ‘no’ vote on the so-called ‘European Constitution’ in France and the Netherlands, and of the need to address the people’s concerns."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph