Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-09-Speech-4-086"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050609.22.4-086"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
In March 2005, the Council carried out a review of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), with a view to making it a more flexible and streamlined instrument. The Council opted to place the emphasis more firmly on the ‘G’ of Growth than the ‘S’ of Stability, in light of the current economic recession that the EU is experiencing. The SGP thus became more politicised.
This review fell short of what was required, however, for a number of reasons, of which I shall highlight two.
Firstly, reform was only needed because some Member States chose, consciously or otherwise, not to observe its rules. Worse still, the EU laid down rules that, quite apart from not being implemented, led to a lax and scarcely credible sanctions process. The Member States are both the judge and the defendant, and would rather fail to implement the SGP than impose sanctions on one of their peers. Being responsible for monitoring the process, the Commission must be granted powers to impose sanctions in the event of non-compliance.
Secondly, any sanction must act as a deterrent and not solely as a punishment. Imposing a non-compliance fine on a Member State with budget difficulties is counterproductive. Other sanctions should be put in place, such as suspending ECOFIN voting rights."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples