Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-07-Speech-2-115"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-06-07"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050607.21.2-115"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-06-07-Speech-2-1162
lpv:speaker	lp:Hélène Goudin and Nils Lundgren (IND/DEM )2
lpv:translated text	"We are completely opposed to this report and believe that, in terms of its individual parts, it is quite absurd. We absolutely cannot support the report’s proposal to increase the appropriations in relation to the Commission’s proposals. We wonder why the Member States cannot manage to develop their rural areas themselves? Or is the general intention behind the EAFRD based on a desire for others to foot the bill? Reasons in terms of distribution policy as to why the rich countries should help the poor countries in the EU may be adduced but, in that case, the poor countries should decide for themselves how the aid is used. Amendment 29 refers to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. This proposal has now been defeated and can no longer be referred to."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph