Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-26-Speech-4-082"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-05-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Nutrition and health claims in labelling2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050526.23.4-082"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-05-26-Speech-4-0832
lpv:speaker	lp:Guido Sacconi2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Democratici di Sinistra (2004-07-29--2008-02-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2006-12-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I will not comment on the merits of this amendment, but I would just like to point out that to vote first on this new Article 3, dealing with Amendments 99 and 32, is perhaps acceptable from a formal point of view, but not from a substantive point of view, insofar as the new Article 3 is nothing but a new version, a ruse to reintroduce the contents of Article 4. That is a fact, and so much so that if, for instance, you had the courage – or the misfortune – to read Amendment 99 and compare it with Amendment 88, you would see that they are identical, save for a small detail regarding the dates. I therefore think it more appropriate to vote on the amendments to Article 4 as such, and only afterwards, and if required, to address those relating to the new Article 3, which seeks to replace Article 4 through the back door."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph