Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-10-Speech-2-154"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-05-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050510.20.2-154"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-05-10-Speech-2-1552
lpv:speaker	lp:Marine Le Pen2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CULT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 substitute; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"In order to better protect the European cultural heritage, Europe intends to establish exceptional conservation and protection measures that will enable its film heritage to be preserved and that will promote efforts to protect the linguistic, cultural and artistic identity of our ancient continent. One of the recommendations proposes extending the benefits of State aid to film. This in fact means extending the ‘cultural exception’ and expanding this exceptional status, which is the exact adaptation of what we champion for France, that is to say national preference! The Commission has taken the decision to extend the current system of State aid for cinematographic and televised works by three years, even though it would be more appropriate to evaluate and reform these far from satisfactory provisions. In these conditions, why limit this protection to culture and not extend it to the textile industry, to agriculture, to the iron and steel industry, to the shipbuilding industry and so on? In the end, will the internationalist logic of the Commission not condemn this moratorium that distorts free competition? The clear defence of national and European preference will alone protect Europe from global ultraliberalism."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph