Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-28-Speech-4-179"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-04-28"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050428.26.4-179"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-04-28-Speech-4-1802
lpv:speaker	lp:Charles Tannock2
lpv:spoken text	". I would like to explain why we as a delegation have largely abstained on the Coveney Report. This report is very largely supported by us and we stand for the highest level of civil and political human rights throughout the world, good governance and democracy as the form of ideal government. Nevertheless, our party has stated a policy position rejecting the International Criminal Court and therefore we cannot support Amendment 45. We are examining the issue of resiling the UN Geneva Convention on Refugees in order to regain control of immigration and asylum policy and therefore cannot support Amendment 35. Similarly, we regard the death penalty for the most serious crimes and abortion as conscience issues and have no stated policies either way. In the light of these considerations we have abstained overall."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; DROI (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2006-02-05)3 member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-21--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-09-29--2007-03-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Tannock (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph