Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-27-Speech-3-117"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-04-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European Agency for Safety and Health at Work2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050427.11.3-117"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-04-27-Speech-3-1182
lpv:speaker	lp:Milan Cabrnoch2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; EMPL (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; CONT (2004-09-28--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". I should like to start by expressing my admiration for the rapporteur’s work, and in particular for the fact that the correct procedures were followed when the report and the motion for a resolution were discussed in the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. As a new MEP and a representative of a new Member State, I find the very existence of the Bilbao Agency a matter for concern. I have yet to be fully convinced that there is any genuine and legitimate need for a separate EU body dedicated to the matter of health and safety at work, given that this is such a narrow, albeit important, field. I will continue to review the arguments that speak in favour of the existence of this institution, as well as any that suggest that it would be preferable for problems relating to health and safety at work to be tackled in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, or in other words at national level alone. As things stand, however, both the motion for a resolution that has been tabled and the rapporteur’s report serve to make the Agency’s work more transparent, and I can therefore endorse the motion for a resolution drafted by the rapporteur. I thank you."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph