Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-14-Speech-4-119"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-04-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050414.19.4-119"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-04-14-Speech-4-1202
lpv:speaker	lp:Sérgio Marques2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2004-09-16--2007-03-13)3 substitute; ECON (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Coligaçao Força Portugal (PPD/PSD.CDS-PP) (2004-07-20--2007-11-22)3 member; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-21--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted in favour of this report on the European Security Strategy (ESS), which for the first time provides a detailed definition of the concept of security. The ESS sees security as a prerequisite for development and focuses on factors that had not thus far been considered fundamental to security. In this regard, among the main threats to global security, it highlights the destructive power of poverty, malnutrition and disease. The ESS lays down three strategic objectives. The EU must be capable of, firstly, identifying threats and taking swift action by military as well as non-military means; secondly, promoting security within its immediate border areas, but also those of the future; and, lastly, strengthening the international order. I should like to emphasise, however, that the EU has serious shortcomings in terms of military means that may hinder its ability to carry out high-intensity humanitarian missions. The EU must be equipped with the technological wherewithal to assess potential threats."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph