Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-04-13-Speech-3-338"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050413.21.3-338"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
I do not think that the issue here is whether or not to take the ‘softly softly’ approach. You have also put this question in a wider context. We do indeed also need to enter into dialogue with Iran regarding its attitude and its support for terrorist activities, and also regarding its attitude towards a peaceful resolution to the problem in the Middle East, and we are doing so. We have done so and we are also in the process of doing so in this overall approach that we have adopted and that we are currently applying in that country, particularly in the context of non-proliferation.
With regard to Hizbollah, to respond to Mr Martin’s speech, I think that it is a complicated group. Indeed, that organisation has several wings, including a parliamentary wing, because it is represented in the Lebanese Parliament. It is for that reason, too, that my response emphasised this Lebanese wing, which we cannot exclude or separate from the more specific context of terrorism against Israel."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples