Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-03-08-Speech-2-305"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-03-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050308.23.2-305"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-03-08-Speech-2-3062
lpv:speaker	lp:Piebalgs2
lpv:spoken text	". As far as I know, there are no nuclear power stations in Poland to close down. The situation in Lithuania is also clear: the Accession Treaty calls for the closure of the Ignalina reactors. That was not because they are old, but during the accession negotiations it became clear that those generators could not be upgraded to meet our safety standards. Lithuania has kept its promise and closed the first reactor on time. I have no doubt that the second will be closed as promised in the Accession Treaty. There is no doubt whatsoever on this. The Baltic States have been part of the CIS electricity link. That is why it is extremely important to provide other links for security of supply. I have already spoken about Estlink. This link connects the Baltic States with the EU’s energy systems. We will have another interconnection between Lithuania and Poland. Is this sufficient? Definitely not, as we will need more interconnection capacities for the development of our internal electricity market. But at least it provides interconnection between the Baltic energy grid and the Central European energy grid."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Member of the Commission"1 "Piebalgs,"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph