Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-03-08-Speech-2-224"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-03-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Services in the internal market/Patentability of computer software2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050308.22.2-224"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-03-08-Speech-2-2252
lpv:speaker	lp:Anders Samuelsen2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2004-07-20--2007-11-26)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-30--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Det Radikale Venstre (2004-07-20--2007-06-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to ask about the matter of software. Stories are circulating in the Danish press to the effect that, despite vigorous protests from the Danish Government and others, the choice was made to keep the point as an A point. Are you able, Commissioner, to confirm that it was not just a question of lying down and accepting the reference to the procedure, but that vigorous protests were made? That is the first issue. Are you able, secondly, to confirm that you yourself were contacted by, for example, the Danish Government with a view to your supporting the Danish Government’s desire to have the software patent down as a B point? Have you been subject to approaches from the Danish Government, designed to obtain support for this point of view? This is something I should like to have clarified."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph