Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-23-Speech-3-103"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050223.10.3-103"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
My view on this issue, like that of the rapporteur, is not entirely devoid of doubts.
Beginning with the key elements, it strikes me that there is potential conflict in the Council seeking to authorise the Member States to do what, in France’s case, they have already done, particularly in an area in which there is no clear guidance as to whether this power rests with the Community or forms part of the exceptions enshrined in the Treaty. Furthermore, the shortcomings that the rapporteur highlights regarding the substance of the convention in question may also make us consider that we should think carefully before adopting it. Against this backdrop, one might vote against this report, for the reasons I have stated. There are two factors, however, that have led us not to do so.
On the one hand, given that it is the Council that wishes to authorise the Member States, the Member States are requesting that authorisation. On the other hand, it is not for Parliament to analyse the efficiency of a convention that is considered efficient by the signatories to it. I therefore voted in favour of the report, with the reservations that I have mentioned."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples