Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-128"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-02-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050222.8.2-128"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-02-22-Speech-2-1292
lpv:speaker	lp:Goudin, Lundgren and Wohlin (IND/DEM )2
lpv:translated text	"We are well disposed to its being possible from 2009 to choose two cultural capitals at a time. The report’s explanatory statement notes, however, that how this project is to be funded is unclear, and reference is made to the forthcoming financial perspective for 2007-2013. We cannot, as matters stand, support something entailing financial commitments in the forthcoming financial perspective. In this situation, there is no reason for hurrying through a decision concerning future cultural capitals. Firstly, the financial perspective for 2007-2013 must be debated in its entirety. Subsequently, this report can come up for debate. The idea of a European capital of culture is a good one. It is so good, even, that it can be funded in a host of other ways, for example through local sponsorship. Financial resources from the European Union should not be necessary to enable this project to survive. We are therefore voting against this report in itself, but are not opposed to the actual idea of the action."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph