Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-122"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-02-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050222.8.2-122"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-02-22-Speech-2-1232
lpv:speaker	lp:Andersson, Hedh, Hedkvist Petersen, Segelström and Westlund (PSE )2
lpv:translated text	"We, Mrs Segelström, Mr Andersson, Mrs Hedh, Mrs Hedkvist Petersen and Mrs Westlund voted in favour of the report but wish now to indicate our differing position on one issue. We cannot support paragraph 1 f, indent 2, which recommends to the Council that it go some way towards harmonising national legislation governing the gathering and assessment of evidence. The principle of the free sifting of evidence is basic to the Swedish criminal law of procedure. Quite a few other Member States have rules to the effect that certain evidence is not permitted. It is thus extremely important to us Swedish Social Democrats that our national system be kept intact. What is more, it is doubtful whether there is any legal basis at all, be it in current treaties or in the forthcoming Constitution, for harmonisation in this respect."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph