Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-12-16-Speech-4-116"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20041216.9.4-116"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"There are a number of sensible points of view in the motion for a resolution, but also a number of proposals that it is impossible for us members of the June List to vote in favour of. In particular, we are opposed to the following four paragraphs of the motion for a resolution.
Paragraph 20: ‘The European Parliament highlights the continuing need for action to strengthen the EU’s external borders, backed by the creation of a European corps of border guards’.
Paragraph 21: ‘[The European Parliament] urges that a European Agency for fundamental rights be established to monitor their application effectively’.
Last part of paragraph 33: ‘[The European Parliament] urges continued parallel reform of the common fisheries policy, including the creation of a European Fisheries Fund’.
Paragraph 40 states: ‘[Parliament] believes that the Commission should draw up, as a matter of urgency, an appropriate communication and campaign strategy which presents the new Constitution to Europe’s citizens in as clear, fair and understandable a way as possible’.
We would note that there are various views of what an ‘appropriate strategy’ is in this context.
In view of the above, we definitely cannot vote in favour of this motion for a resolution."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples