Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-12-02-Speech-4-077"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
rdf:type |
|
dcterms:Date |
|
dcterms:Is Part Of |
|
dcterms:Language |
|
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20041202.8.4-077"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent |
|
lpv:speaker |
|
lpv:spokenAs |
|
lpv:translated text |
".
We are aware of the pressure to award tax sovereignty – the ability to raise taxes – to the EU and we are firmly opposed to this, because sovereignty in this area is an essential element of a country’s sovereignty. We are similarly aware of the dangers of progressive tax harmonisation, the aim of which is gradually to move along the path towards a federal Europe. We would never oppose, however, greater tax coordination aimed at taxing the unbridled circulation of capital, at combating tax fraud and tax evasion, at putting an end to tax havens and at stopping money laundering.
The savings directive, which forms part of what is known as the Monti package, contributes, in spite of dangers and shortcomings, towards setting up a system in which the Member States’ tax administrations exchange information – including lifting banking secrecy – so that they can tax interest accrued in another Member State. Accordingly, the Council has authorised the Commission to negotiate agreements with Switzerland, the USA, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino under which those countries would adopt equivalent measures to prevent the flight of capital. We welcome these agreements, not, as the rapporteur claims, due to the internal market, but because coordination is required to tax capital and to combat tax havens, particularly when the bulk of the tax burden falls on employees. We feel, however, that the terms of the agreement do not ensure such a proposal."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples
Context graph