Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-11-17-Speech-3-293"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20041117.10.3-293"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". Question No 9 by Proinsias De Rossa () Will the Council explain how it drew up the list of Burmese state-owned enterprises identified in Council Common Position 2004/730/CFSP? In particular, will the Council explain why Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE), Myanmar Timber Enterprise, and Myanmar Post and Telecoms have been left off the list; and why no EU joint venture companies were listed? How does the Council propose to ensure that EU corporate involvement in Burma's important energy sector will be blocked? How it propose to monitor and update its list by including other relevant companies? Does it intend to identify those European companies already involved in contracts or agreements, and does it intend to seek to influence those companies to withdraw from such contracts or agreements once their current contractual obligations so allow? In view of the Commission's statement in response to questiondoes the Council propose to achieve the utmost compliance from Member States with the common position?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph