Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-10-25-Speech-1-106"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Consequences of the rise in oil prices for the European economy, agriculture and fisheries2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20041025.15.1-106"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-10-25-Speech-1-1072
lpv:speaker	lp:Dimitrios Papadimoulis2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras ton Kinimaton kai tis Oikologias (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Temporary committee on policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 (2004-10-14--2005-06-08)3,3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; EMPL (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; DROI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Commissioner, despite the gravity of the situation, all we have heard from you is a mixture of reassuring generalities, wish lists and neo-liberal doctrine. Competition must be saved at all costs. However, the rise in oil prices places a burden on low incomes and increases the tax revenue of the Member States. There are Member States saying we should refund part of our enhanced revenue to low incomes. In France in particular, there is talk of tax refunds. In Greece, a reduction in the tax collected by the state has been proposed in order to relieve the pressure on low incomes. Farmers and fishermen are not satisfied with studies, they want specific measures. I should therefore like you to tell us in your reply why the majority rejects the proposals emerging from France or from Greece and when a decision will be taken on specific measures for farmers and fishermen."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph